Property and Civ. Pro. from the SCOTX

Posted on May 14, 2010 by Kendall Gray

Two new opinions from the Supreme Court of Texas today. 

  • Alas, the tow truck driver does not get to keep the large amount of cash found hidden around a suspicious truck's axle, even if his lawyer goes back to his 1L Property notes and pulls out doctrines like "bailment" and "treasure trove" otherwise known as "finders keepers." See State v. $281,420.00 In United States Currency.  But it is kind of cool to see "treasure trove" and "finders keepers" in print.  Justice O'Neill wrote the opinion.
  • And yes, a dismissal "with prejudice" really is "with prejudice" even when it ought not to have been so prejudicial.  The DWOP dismissal after a non-suit precludes a later action, even if the trial court should have left well enough alone rather than erroneously DWOP-ing the case.  The judgment, even if erroneous, is not void and protestations that the dog ate it or that one never received the order will not suffice if the judgment has not been set aside.  See The Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joachim.  Justice Green wrote the opinion.  

No more petitions granted in today's orders, and no conference on the calendar next week with much work to be done before the summer dolldrums.  SCOTX needs to find that finishing kick.

Tags: , , , , ,

Now We're Getting Somewhere

Posted on April 19, 2010 by Kendall Gray

Several weeks ago, a post here on TXI Transportation v. Hughes (pdf) made mention of the fact that a majority of our current Supreme Court of Texas would not have had opportunity to serve at the time of that court's 1889 opinion, Moss v. Sanger, condemning appeals to racial animus in arguments to the jury.

Something just as cool happened this week.  John Council of the Texas Lawyer Blog noted:

. . . Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson was traveling yesterday and could not be at oral arguments. So, by tradition, the most senior justice on the court took his spot in presiding over the first case on the docket. Since Justice Nathan Hecht, the high court’s longest- serving justice, recused himself from hearing TGS- NOPEC Geophysical Co. v. Susan Combs, et al., the job of presiding over the court fell to the next most senior justice, Harriet O’Neill. O’Neill says she didn’t realize it at the time, but it was a historic moment. A woman has not presided over the Texas Supreme Court since 1925, when Gov. Pat Neff appointed an all-woman court. . . .

But the really really cool part is that it happened as a matter of course and nobody noticed until after the fact.  Justice Harriet O'Neill just happened to be the senior justice on duty, and she just did her job, as she has been doing since 1999.  John Council quotes Justice O'Neill:

Isn’t that amazing? I didn’t even think about it,” . . . .

Now we're getting somewhere--when the "right thing" that used to be so hard to do or so exceptional or so controversial becomes so accepted that it happens without a thought.  Nice.

Tags: , , ,