The Power of No

I don't know who died and made me Ethics Czar.

I'm sure my character does not equip me to lecture the appellate nerds on ethics at the UTCLE Appellate Conference.

And I'm sure my MPRE score would be no endorsement for ethical expertise.

And yet here I am, scheduled to wag my ethical finger at the smartest lawyers in the state on June 13.

About all I know is that there is one sure fire way to solve all problems of legal ethics. And if we resorted to it more often, lawyers of a certain age (like me) might have more or their hair.

After the jump, the power of no, and a preview of my speechifying.

Continue Reading...

Death of an Appellate Lawyer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hat tip to flippincomics.com

 

The Power of Time

It's that time of year, Campers.

All the cool kids are about to go to Austin for that one event where the glitterati are bound to glitter.

UTCLE's 23rd Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals will soon be upon us, June 13-14 in Austin, to be specific.

Clearly, they have mistaken me for a UT grad, because I always seem to have a chance to hold forth and flap my gums at this event.

This year, they were kind enough to give me a very thorough paper written by someone else, Charles Frazier, about "Bombshells in the Appellate Record."

After the jump, one little thought about avoiding those bombshells.

 

Continue Reading...

For Our Northern Readers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hat tip to sodahead.com

Creatively Correct

My wife knows the tremendous burden I must bear.

The burden of constantly being right.

About everything.

All. The. Time.

**sigh**

It has happened again.

Recently, in the Texas Lawyer, I wrote about how unforced time for incubation was essential to creativity. Allowing the brain to do seemingly nothing is the ingredient without which insight or inspiration will not happen.

But law practice actually discourages down time and "incubation." So, I tried to come up with ways we can preserve the brain space we need to be effective, like:

  • Setting aside time to sit and be quiet
  • Exercising or taking a walk in the middle of the day to re-boot
  • Weaning yourself from your computer screens
  • Learning to say no, so that each project gets the incubation time it requires.

Little did I realize the power of the Appellate Record echo chamber. In rapid succession, several pieces appeared in the New York Times or on the BBC confirming just how right we were. Check out:

  • Brain, Interrupted in the Times about how toggling between devices and distractions is impairing and reshaping our cognitive function.
  • BBC Radio 4's program about Digital Detox and why we need to control our devices.
  • This piece from the Times about how a walk through green space can ease brain fatigue and focus the mind, even in kids with ADHD.
  • And THIS PIECE from the times about the potential link between inadequate sleep and behaviors that doctors label as ADHD.

Preserve that creative stuff between your ears. As Vice President Quayle rightly observed, "What a terrible thing to have lost one's mind. Or not to have a mind at all. How true that is."

Now, pardon me while I check my Facebook.

 

My Chief Experiments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The event is finally here--meaning I can almost stop working on this project and return to normal life.

This Friday, April 26, 2013, is the Exceptional Legal Writing seminar at the Texas Law Center in Austin.

Part of my presentation on "Clarity and Grace" includes an investigation to see if the concepts taught by Joseph M. Williams hold true for legal writers the same way that they do for academic writers. To give that investigation some scientifical truthiness, I subjected three chief justices to a randomized, scientific trial.

I wanted to see if the judges known for clear and graceful writing crafted their prose like Williams said they ought to. I also wanted to see if the Williams DNA was absent in a chief justice whose prose was hard to read.

But don't worry. No Chiefs were harmed in the making of this presentation.

The results very clear, even if we ought not be surprised by them. There is no such thing as good legal writing. There is only good writing and lousy writing. The topic does not matter. The topic does not change what you need to do to engage your reader.

I hope you can attend.

 

Back to Basics

Anybody remember what these are?

These are the basic forms used for diagramming the parts of speech in a sentence.

If you are a person of a certain age, and if you took middle school English before American education got all soft and wobbly, then you had to diagram sentences.

If you don't recognize these, then your education was rubbish and you are to be pitied, you poor, empty-headed, millennial hipster.

But I digress.

I have Mrs. Gee and her "old school" instruction to thank for my knowledge of this little tool. At the time, I thought she was nuts. "I'm never going to use this."

Boy, was I wrong. In preparing my paper and presentation for the "Exceptional Legal Writing" seminar, I discovered that the skills taught by Mrs. Gee are the ones that count. If you want to write and be understood, get a grasp of sentence diagrams.

After the jump, a hymn of praise to the sentence diagram.

Continue Reading...

Just Because They Are Funny

Happy National Grammar Day

For want of some serial commas, Rachel Ray kills puppies and engages in cannibalism.

Allegedly.

There Are No Bad Puns